ANATOMY, IN YOUR FIELD
A teaching model and a reconstruction study ask different things of software. We’re building around those differences.
We’re developing the suite for research and education first. The software has not been clinically validated and must not be used for diagnosis or treatment decisions.
Medical imaging teams
We’re working towards a place to inspect anatomy, compare representations and carry source details through the modelling process.
Private preview: image and model inspection. Broader study compatibility is still being evaluated.
Discuss your work ↗Research & engineering
Compare methods, record changes and investigate where an edit helps or loses detail. Our current research is focused on these questions.
Research build: comparisons on curated inputs. Broader validation remains ahead.
Discuss your work ↗Anatomy education
We’re exploring how interactive models can support teaching, self-directed study and conversations about how structures fit together.
Proposed educational use. Teaching outcomes have not been evaluated.
Discuss your work ↗3D modelling teams
Our planned tools will help teams review geometry and keep units, coordinates and processing details alongside their exports.
Private preview: model review and selected exports. Suitability for each downstream task needs checking.
Discuss your work ↗Simulation research
Geometry inspection could support preparation for research simulations. The suitability of a model would still need to be established for each task.
Potential future use. Simulation integration is not currently available.
Discuss your work ↗Healthcare organisations
We welcome conversations about review responsibilities, local processing and the practical requirements of introducing new software.
Discovery and research evaluation only. No clinical deployment offering yet.
Discuss your work ↗What would make working with scans and models easier for your team?